GRE寫作評(píng)分及常見問題解讀,我們一起來看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來欣賞一下吧。
GRE寫作評(píng)分及常見問題解讀
GRE作文包括issue和argument兩部分，總分為6分，以下是GRE作文評(píng)分的一些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，希望能給廣大GRE考生帶來一些幫助。
(1) complexity:事物的兩面性(同一事物有優(yōu)點(diǎn)就有缺點(diǎn)，相比較的事物有各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn))，從多角度分析事物(分析不同領(lǐng)域中，不同情況下)。論點(diǎn)一邊倒的文章論述得再好也只能得5分。
(2) insightful position：在有全面深刻理解的基礎(chǔ)上，觀點(diǎn)最好新穎獨(dú)到(對(duì)ets來說)，但必須保證能自圓其說。
(3) conveys meaning skillfully:可用于論證的一切技巧(估計(jì)老美自己用起來也得費(fèi)點(diǎn)心思)。比如文章的行文方向，起承轉(zhuǎn)合不用明顯的標(biāo)志詞(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point)，而是依靠論述的內(nèi)在脈絡(luò)(只可意會(huì)不可言傳)自然而然的引到下一塊內(nèi)容。
(4) compelling reasons(reason就已經(jīng)夠令人頭疼的了，有加了個(gè)compelling)：這是最重要的一個(gè)得分點(diǎn)。
(5) persuasive examples：用來支持reason的，使抽象的reason更具體，更易被讀者理解，從而產(chǎn)生共鳴，或使其更可信，更有說服力。可用的例子有自己的經(jīng)歷，引言。
(6) well-focused:簡(jiǎn)單說就是不跑題。中心論點(diǎn)明確，全文不跑題;各段主題句明確，圍繞主題句論述。
(7) well-organized：文章采用的論述結(jié)構(gòu)，分幾個(gè)部分論述，每部分有幾段，各部分、各段間的關(guān)系是什么。
(8) connecting ideas logically：using transitional phrases起承轉(zhuǎn)合詞，過渡句，或有此種作用的句子，總之起到help organize the ideas and move the argument forward。
(9) 跟著感覺走沒錯(cuò)。
(10) 不要羅嗦，表達(dá)簡(jiǎn)潔。但如果以上幾點(diǎn)做得好，這缺點(diǎn)可以忽略不計(jì)。
(11) 基本上挺難，但不影響大局，為避免重復(fù)大膽的用你想用的詞，閱卷人能理解。
(12) sentence variety：最好長(zhǎng)短句結(jié)合，ets藐視總用短句的人：Since most of the sentences are short and choppy, the ideas they try to communicate are also choppy.
(13) 還有語法錯(cuò)誤等等，小毛病，先把上面的問題解決好在理它吧。
GRE issue寫作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：權(quán)威問題
題目：
Much of the information that people assume is 'factual' actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a 'fact' should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多數(shù)人們認(rèn)為是事實(shí)的信息結(jié)果實(shí)際上都是不準(zhǔn)確的。因此，任何據(jù)稱是事實(shí)的信息都應(yīng)該被質(zhì)疑，因?yàn)樗趯砗芸赡軙?huì)被證明為是錯(cuò)誤的。
正文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so, I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things, however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with, the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to arguer that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno, the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for, while just a minor particle in it. Equally, no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity, the fact never changes that Teals' electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one, and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However, what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that, due to the limitation of human's knowledge and comprehensive capability, they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time, our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits,the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases, and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism, no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr, because their theories are based on distinct views, the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts, these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament, the conclusions we make might well be justifiable, if not completely right, to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application, instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body, they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients, of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up, while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately, for the reason of the limitation of the abilities, I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves, as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis, I would arguer once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable, we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
GRE issue寫作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：思想家
題目：
Most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously, even when they claim to admire them.
大多數(shù)社會(huì)都沒把最偉大的思想家當(dāng)回事，雖然有時(shí)候這些社會(huì)自稱是求才若渴的。
正文：
In this busy, packed and dull world, people’s most important concerning is how to make a living. They work assiduously to make money, to support their family, to purchase houses and cars. Hardly one common individual knows who their greatest thinkers are，not mention to take them seriously. Admittedly, in some cases, people claim that they admire the greatest thinkers; however, they actually know little about what the greatest thinkers’ thoughts are. The fact is, in history of human civilizations,most societies do not take their greatest thinkers seriously, even when the greatest thinkers are seemed to be respected.
Generally, whatever societies the greatest thinkers are in, they have similar characteristics, such as high intelligence, eccentric temperament, wide range of knowledge, and the most essential one: the deeply and often predicted thoughts, which is the product of real wisdom. On one hand, it is the thoughts that distinguish the greatest thinkers from the mass. On the other hand, it is also the thoughts, however correct and predicted, which cause these elites out of the mass’ sights and put them into an embarrassment in which few can understand them and their thoughts. A proper example is the passional German philosopher and poet Nietzche. Nietzche is a pioneer, whose profound exploration in philosophy influenced the descendants deeply. Yet his life is miserable and full of tragedies. Without money and job, Nietzche lived an impoverished life, which along with loneliness defeated him at last: he became insane when 45, and died 10 years later. Until that time, almost no one knew him or his thoughts. Even today, many people including some scholars call him mad philosopher.
In some worse cases, the greatest thinkers are even persecuted by their societies since the greatest thinkers always tend to have skeptical and critical thoughts, which the manipulators fear mostly and manipulated reluctant to accept. The reason is that once the advanced ideas, which are against the old ones, are accepted by mass, the domination or the present social system will in the danger of collapse. And at the same times, most people are reluctant to admit that what they believe in or cherish, however,always prejudice and rigid ideas set in people’s minds beforehand, are not the truth but falsehood or illusions. A case in point is the great astronomer Copernicus, who developed the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun. Although the theory was the most advanced astronomy theory in that time, it hadn’t come out of press until the year before Copernicus’ death because of mass being strongly against it especially the powerful churches, which were afraid that such a theory would shake authority of theology.
In some specific period, for political reasons, thinker and intellectuals as a whole undergo ruthless treatment, such as the Culture Revolution from 1966 to 1976 in China. During those ten years, many great thinkers and intellectuals are forbidden to think and express their thoughts freely. Some of them even encountered physical torture. A crueler example is Qin Dynasty in China 2000 years ago. Yingzheng, the first emperor of China, sentenced the thinkers who held different political or social ideas from him to death. Moreover, he buried their writings.
It is the greatest thinkers’ tragedy not to be understood or even be persecuted. It is also the fact that human beings are always shortsighted, sometimes even foolish. Nevertheless, what is truth will never change itself or disappear along with the elapsing of time however strong the falsehood seems to be. Hence, though almost all the greatest thinkers are hermits, some of them may be even the prisoners in their societies; they would gain their perpetual lives through their glaring
GRE寫作評(píng)分及常見問題解讀相關(guān)文章：
