備考GRE寫(xiě)作ISSUE的三點(diǎn)建議,我們一起來(lái)看看吧，下面小編就和大家分享，來(lái)欣賞一下吧。
備考GRE寫(xiě)作ISSUE的三點(diǎn)建議
自改革以來(lái)，很多考生感到茫然，特別是新gre寫(xiě)作的issue部分，很多issue的原論點(diǎn)都經(jīng)過(guò)特殊設(shè)計(jì)，由于新GRE寫(xiě)作是我們的薄弱環(huán)節(jié)，面對(duì)新GRE寫(xiě)作題目我們寫(xiě)不好的根本原因是審題不對(duì)以及論證素材和論據(jù)素材太少，以至我們向外輸出內(nèi)容過(guò)于空洞乏味，下面是小編搜集的如何備考新gre issue寫(xiě)作的三點(diǎn)建議介紹：
1.審題上
我們有時(shí)覺(jué)得有些題目太抽象，無(wú)從下手的感覺(jué)，這個(gè)時(shí)候我們千萬(wàn)不能以抽象對(duì)抽象，而應(yīng)該抓住某個(gè)關(guān)鍵詞展開(kāi)從而具體化，這樣我們的論證才有力，有說(shuō)服力。比如有道關(guān)于人們是追求knowledge 還是追求certainty這個(gè)問(wèn)題，我們可以具體化的，分領(lǐng)域分學(xué)科展開(kāi)，就可以有話可說(shuō)了，領(lǐng)域?qū)W科不必面面俱到，只需要選幾個(gè)典型的自己認(rèn)為自己能夠說(shuō)得清的領(lǐng)域就好。
2.在具體論證上
分論點(diǎn)之間最好有邏輯上的連續(xù)性，就是說(shuō)你是按照什么原則組織你的觀點(diǎn)的，這點(diǎn)很重要，體現(xiàn)了自己對(duì)整個(gè)題目的把握程度吧，讀者讀起來(lái)也感覺(jué)很嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，無(wú)懈可擊。具體的怎么審題論證我在我的《新G復(fù)習(xí)進(jìn)行時(shí)》中有論及，可以參考下。
3.最后一點(diǎn)，AW
個(gè)人并不覺(jué)得用長(zhǎng)難復(fù)雜句很好，因?yàn)殚L(zhǎng)難復(fù)雜句要寫(xiě)好是很難的，如果沒(méi)有足夠的功底不要輕易為之。如果我們能用一句非常簡(jiǎn)單的話表述一個(gè)相對(duì)復(fù)雜的意思就用簡(jiǎn)單句唄，這樣才更體現(xiàn)出你對(duì)語(yǔ)言的掌控能力。我們經(jīng)常犯的錯(cuò)誤是把狀語(yǔ)從句隨意地并列在一起，然后把賓語(yǔ)從句也并得很長(zhǎng)，像GRE閱讀那種，定語(yǔ)從句呢，用的時(shí)候覺(jué)得一定要放好位置，恰到好處，讀起來(lái)不顯得生硬為好，否則就不要寫(xiě)。之前高中老師講語(yǔ)法時(shí)提到，寫(xiě)復(fù)雜句，一定要把握好句子的重心，重心最好出現(xiàn)在前面，而不要太繞，讓讀者讀了幾個(gè)狀語(yǔ)和定語(yǔ)之后才看到你的真正的主謂賓等。
新GRE寫(xiě)作issue一定要較為詳細(xì)的寫(xiě)Issue提綱，否則，在考場(chǎng)如果遇到?jīng)]有思考過(guò)的題目，很容易亂了陣腳，臨場(chǎng)去想，導(dǎo)致失敗。此外，新GRE issue寫(xiě)作題目必須考前按題材分類去寫(xiě)提綱，知道對(duì)立面和大致寫(xiě)作思路，往往論據(jù)在同類的很多題目中通用。希望以上三點(diǎn)建議對(duì)大家備考新GRE考試有所幫助。
GRE issue寫(xiě)作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：全球化大學(xué)問(wèn)題
題目：
"All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."
所有的國(guó)家都應(yīng)該支持發(fā)展一所全球性的大學(xué)，它的主要目的是要讓學(xué)生們致力于解決世界上最難纏的社會(huì)問(wèn)題。
正文：
A global university, considered as absorbing foreign students and faculty, cooperating with foreign universities and facing a highly globalized view, is recently being accepted and desired by more and more countries, since it can concentrate the world's most talent intellectuals, so as to gain different perspectives and successful experiences. On the other hand, nowadays world is facing diversified social problems,including poverty, economical reform, terrorism, multi-media globalization,environmental problems and so forth, many of which are interacted between elements separated in different nations, therefore asking for a global sight to analyze and solve.In these senses, I think it will serve many nations' interests to develop a global university to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems.
Universities are born to provide nation elite in evey field of it. From ancient Greek forums to nowadays world-top universities, these campuses have never lacked of young students who are eager for knowledge and ideals, as well as experienced and erudite teachers. In both teaching and researching aspects, modern universities are playing an important role propelling the world's development. Consider these facts:the first computer which had then changed the world was made in University of Pennsylvania; a myriad scientists who won Nobel Prize came from Princeton University; many of current leaders of China graduated from the nation's most famous university, Tsinghua University; the architecture department of Delft University,which locates in Amsterdam, has provided not only the Netherlands but also the whole world a number of van ward and creative architecture masters. It is these universities' feat that has solved many social problems, changed the world dramatically and supported it by their graduates or undergraduates.
Realizing the important function of universities, establishing a global one seems more effective in solving the world's most difficult social problems, which ask for a myriad efforts and most intelligent talent, in the following three points.
Firstly, a global university which gains students from different nations, different cultural backgrounds and different education systems can therefore contain diversified views, methods and perspectives when dealing with a social problem. Students in different countries are taught in their unique basic education systems, and they are influenced by the society and their traditional culture separately. New views can be brought to a global universitiy by those who have never been to its nation, making its thoughts more creative. For instance, as an American university student, IM. Pei, who was born in China and entered the countries far away from his motherland, won his first competition, the Monument of Vienam War. This monument was considered as a very important issue to show Americans' views to that cruel and tragedy war. IM. Pei used a different way to create a knife like shape into the site and made the monument full of symbols. After his graduation, IM Pei has then managed many global projects.Undoubtedly, a multi educating background gave him the ability to face architecture in different nations. As the students receive such diversified creative methods, the society will benefit a lot from a global university, which seems to be bidirectional.
Secondly, a global university itself can be a solvent for many social problems, such as racism, war and national abhorrence. Students in universities will likely become the nations' leaders after their graduation, since they are most educated and intellectual. In a global university, elite from different countries, with different skin colors will get together. They get in touch with each other, understand others' thoughts, religions and learn about tolerance, communication and so forth. Because of such communications with foreigners, global students will come out of campuses of global universities, bringing a global world for peace, tolerance and understand.
Thirdly, from developing a global university, a country's education system can absorb successful experience from other countries during its reforming progress. Universities in different countries have different researching, teaching and managing methods.Some are reasonable, while others are not. By learning from international students and teachers, an university can understand the world's most advanced teaching methods,managing structure and so forth. China has understood this, therefore making its Peking and TsinghuaUniversity more globalized, by inviting professors from other nations, encouraging international enrollment and learning from American top universities. Professors and students from Princeton, MIT, UPEN, Delft, Oxford and many other world top universities join in their projects and forums, therefore providing these universities vitalized development. Such projects and forums are many focused on environmental problems, poverty, urban renovation and other social problems, having solved many persistent ones.
To sum up, a global university can be effective when dealing with the world's most persistent social problems, considering about its mentioned advantages. Although languages, resources and policies may play as obstacles during a global university’s establishment, I believe all nations need a global university or even more for its further development, because the world's social problems need the whole world to face, especially for those who have made themselves branch into this uniformed system.
GRE issue寫(xiě)作優(yōu)秀實(shí)例：過(guò)度專業(yè)化問(wèn)題
題目：
"Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience, their ideas will have little use."
近些年來(lái)，學(xué)科已經(jīng)細(xì)化到了相當(dāng)?shù)某潭纫灾劣趯W(xué)者們的理念只影響小范圍的人群。除非學(xué)者們能擁有影響等大范圍的人群，否則他們的理念將幾乎毫無(wú)用處。
正文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years, scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries, the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology, which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems, we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas, which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology, more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come: how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system, it means a new discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods, which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines, otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!
From the above, we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge, it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy, it is necessary for a person, who wants to make progress in his discipline, to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain, that is to say, to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand, if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area, he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put, we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others, but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
The structure of human knowledge is just like the complexity of a net, which means various disciplines have interconnections and a progress in one will undoubtedly bring changes to some others, which is because scholars belonging to related areas will probably get useful implication from progress happened in this one. And with this similar process going further, innovations may occur in several other disciplines, which will even bring forth new disciplines. It is obvious that scholars' ideas can reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure without necessarily reaching wider audiences directly.
備考GRE寫(xiě)作ISSUE的三點(diǎn)建議相關(guān)文章：
1.帶你了解托福與雅思的區(qū)別
